Preparing Your Facility for EV Fire Risks
Why EV Fire Preparedness Matters for Businesses
Electric vehicles are reshaping transportation, supporting cleaner mobility and opening new possibilities for businesses. At the same time, this transition has raised a common concern, often amplified by dramatic news coverage and social media footage: Do EV fires represent a growing risk?
Although fires involving electric vehicles remain relatively rare, they differ significantly from conventional gasoline vehicle fires due to the chemistry of lithium-ion batteries. For businesses with EVs on site, whether in parking structures, fleet yards, maintenance areas, or charging locations, understanding these hazards is more than a precaution. It is a necessary part of site safety planning. That starts with putting an up-to-date fire containment strategy in place.
Why EV Fire Planning Is Becoming Essential
Electric vehicles are no longer a niche part of the transportation landscape. They represent one of the biggest changes in mobility since the widespread adoption of the internal combustion engine. Quieter operation, lower emissions, and improved efficiency have made EVs an increasingly common presence across commercial and public facilities. Today, businesses regularly encounter them in parking structures, fleet operations, service bays, warehouses, loading zones, campuses, office developments, and municipal sites.
As adoption continues to rise, so has public attention around EV-related fires. Online videos showing electric vehicles burning intensely or releasing dramatic flare-like jets have spread widely, often creating the impression that EVs are unusually prone to catching fire without warning.
The reality is more complex.
Fires involving EVs remain statistically uncommon and occur less frequently than fires involving gasoline-powered vehicles. However, when they do happen, they present a very different type of hazard. Because lithium-ion batteries can react in ways far more complex than those of a conventional vehicle fire, these incidents require a different safety mindset and response strategy.
That has created an important question for today’s facilities: are they equipped to control an EV fire long enough to protect people, property, and surrounding structures before emergency crews can take over?
In many cases, the immediate objective is not to fully extinguish the battery fire. It is to contain the event and prevent it from spreading.
That shift, from extinguishment to containment, is changing how organizations approach fire protection. For many businesses, the first step is understanding the risks associated with lithium-ion batteries, recognizing how these fires behave, and implementing measures to reduce damage and preserve valuable response time.
EV Fires and Gasoline Vehicle Fires: Understanding the Real Risk
One of the most common misunderstandings about electric vehicles is the idea that they catch fire more often than gasoline-powered vehicles. Canadian guidance does not support that conclusion. Transport Canada states that EVs are not more prone to fires than internal combustion engine vehicles, although EV fires can burn hotter, last longer, and are more likely to re-ignite.
Research from several jurisdictions points in the same general direction:
Transport Canada says EVs are not more prone to fires than internal combustion vehicles.
Data from Sweden indicates that gasoline and diesel vehicles are significantly more likely to catch fire than EVs.
Tesla has also reported a lower fire rate than the broader U.S. vehicle fleet average when measured by distance traveled.
So why do EV fires seem so common?
Part of the reason is visibility. These incidents are still relatively new to the public, less familiar to many businesses, and often more visually intense when they occur. As a result, they tend to attract disproportionate media attention, which can shape public perception more strongly than the underlying statistics.
The more important issue is not how often EV fires occur, but how differently they behave when they do.
Comparison Table: EV Fires vs. Gasoline Vehicle Fires
| Category | Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Vehicles | Electric Vehicles (EVs) |
|---|---|---|
| Fire Frequency | Very common | Much lower frequency |
| Primary Cause | Fuel leaks, electrical faults, overheating | Battery damage, defects, charging issues, thermal runaway |
| Temperature Range | 815 to 1,000 °C | Similar temperatures, can exceed 1,100 °C |
| Fire Behavior | Burns quickly but predictably | May produce jet-like flames and intense directional heat |
| Extinguishing Method | Foam, water, smothering | Cooling only; smothering ineffective |
| Water Required | Hundreds of gallons | Thousands to tens of thousands of gallons |
| Toxic Smoke | Harmful but typical combustion byproducts | Highly toxic gases: HF, HCN, CO, heavy metals |
| Reignition Risk | Low once extinguished | High (hours or days later) due to stranded energy |
| Containment Need | Moderate | Critical (especially in enclosed spaces) |
Why EV Fire Response Focuses on Containment
Fire professionals around the world increasingly approach lithium-ion battery fires with the same core understanding: the priority is not simply to extinguish the fire, but to contain it, reduce heat, and prevent the incident from spreading.
That is why EV fire incidents often demand a more complex response, which may include:
large volumes of water for prolonged cooling
specialized personal protective equipment and respiratory protection
extended on-site observation
isolation procedures after the vehicle is removed
environmental remediation related to contaminated runoff
Ongoing precautions because reignition can occur well after the initial event
For businesses, the operational impact is clear.
Parking structures may require updated emergency response procedures. Fleet operators need a plan for isolating affected vehicles. Automotive facilities must consider how to protect nearby vehicles and equipment. Warehouses face added risk when ignition occurs near valuable inventory. Public-facing sites need a way to help control heat and smoke long enough to support a safe evacuation.
This is where EV fire-containment blankets, particularly those designed specifically for electric vehicles, can play an important role in a broader risk-management strategy.
Conventional fire blankets are typically intended to suppress flames by cutting off the oxygen supply. That approach is far less effective in a lithium-ion battery fire, because these batteries can generate the conditions needed to sustain thermal runaway from within.
EV fire blankets are designed with that challenge in mind. Solutions such as the JUTEC Lithium-Ion Fire Limitation Blanket, distributed by DENIOS, are engineered not only to smother a fire but also to contain the event, limit heat transfer, and support emergency response efforts.
Key performance features include:
resistance to temperatures up to 2,372 °F
certification to DIN SPEC 91489
a flexible design for fast deployment
open-pore material that absorbs cooling water and helps prevent ballooning
reduced heat transfer to nearby vehicles, equipment, and structures
containment of flames and smoke long enough to support evacuation
lower risk of fire spreading to adjacent vehicles
straightforward two-person deployment
EV Fire Blanket Deployment Guide
For a practical overview of when an EV fire blanket should be used and how to deploy it correctly, download the quick deployment guide. It outlines common use cases, the four primary deployment steps, and key guidance on safe handling, storage, and use during EV fire incidents.
Where EV Fire Blankets Make the Biggest Difference
In real incidents, a fire blanket doesn’t extinguish battery cells, but it buys time, reduces spread, lowers heat impact, and creates safer conditions for responders. This makes EV fire blankets especially valuable for:
Parking structures
Auto dealerships
Fleet depots
Municipal lots
Workplace EV charging
Loading docks
Logistics depots
Service centers
Residential towers with EV parking
Car Storage Centers
Complete Your Lithium-Ion Safety Strategy
RELATED CONTENT
The specialist information on this page has been compiled carefully and to the best of our knowledge and belief. Nevertheless, DENIOS Inc cannot assume any warranty or liability of any kind, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, for the topicality, completeness and correctness either towards the reader or towards third parties. The use of the information and content for your own or third party purposes is therefore at your own risk. In any case, please observe the locally and currently applicable legislation.